Conducting a Systematic Literature Review on Water-Related Attitudes, Behaviors, and Stakeholder Engagement Approaches in Florida: Strategies and Tools

Bruce V Lilyea, Robin Cooper, Jorge Rice, Marcelle DuPraw, Stacy R Allsop

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is unusual to find a description of the literature review process in environmental and conservation-based research reports, however transparent and repeatable systematic research processes are key to establishing the rigor and validity of the literature review. The purpose of this article is to provide researchers with specific tools and strategies for conducting effective and efficient literature reviews. A solid methodology is essential to undergird an evidence-based approach to research and the review of the concomitant literature. To demonstrate the tools, techniques, and other key elements, the authors use their experience conducting a literature review on water conservation research pertinent to southwest Florida’s Rookery Bay Estuary. The core concepts from this article’s formal systematic literature review framework, including the principles of transparency, duplicability, expansiveness, and the limitation of bias, positively impact the mechanics of the process including establishing search criteria, conducting the search, coding the sources, and writing the review. Strategies of resource application (i.e., social science librarians and gray literature), the role of research questions throughout the literature review, and approaches to audience inclusion as well as tools such as inclusion criteria, beneficial checklists, and a coding matrix further systematize the literature review process.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)87-102
Number of pages16
JournalThe International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences: Annual Review
Volume11
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Funding

The authors would like to thank Tabitha Stadler and the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve and Dr. Honggang Yang, Dean of NSU’s School of Humanities and Social Sciences, for their support of this project. Portions of sections 2 and 3 of this article are drawn from a report prepared for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Department) by the authors on behalf of Nova Southeastern University. Funding for that report was provided in part by a National Estuarine Research Reserve System’s Science Collaborative grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Ocean Service Award No. NA09NOS4190153, and by the Department, through its Office of Coastal and Aquatic Managed Areas. The views, statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the State of Florida, US Department of Commerce, NOAA, or any of its subagencies. The authors would like to thank Tabitha Stadler and the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve and Dr. Honggang Yang, Dean of NSU's School of Humanities and Social Sciences, for their support of this project. Portions of sections 2 and 3 of this article are drawn from a report prepared for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Department) by the authors on behalf of Nova Southeastern University. Funding for that report was provided in part by a National Estuarine Research Reserve System's Science Collaborative grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Ocean Service Award No. NA09NOS4190153, and by the Department, through its Office of Coastal and Aquatic Managed Areas. The views, statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the State of Florida, US Department of Commerce, NOAA, or any of its subagencies.

FundersFunder number
Tabitha Stadler
U.S. Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNA09NOS4190153
Nova Southeastern University

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • General Social Sciences

    Keywords

    • publication bias
    • systematic literature review
    • tools and strategies
    • water management
    • Systematic Literature Review
    • Publication Bias
    • Water Management
    • Tools and Strategies

    Disciplines

    • Peace and Conflict Studies

    Cite this