TY - JOUR
T1 - How group and perceiver characteristics affect collective blame following counterproductive work behavior
AU - Wurthmann, Kurt
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Two experimental studies, based on a model using a novel integration of theories, provide evidence that collective blame, the assignment of blame to members of a group besides the member(s) who directly caused a misdeed, in the aftermath of counterproductive work behavior (CWB) is higher when a group of coworkers is perceived as a single entity. Further, the studies consistently show that this relationship is mediated by inferences about both indirect causality and common blameworthy traits among group members. These findings extend prior research, which has not considered mediation in this relationship by dual inferences. Additionally, perceivers’ implicit theories about people's character were found to moderate the inferences they favor, with inferences about indirect causality versus common traits favored by perceivers with implicit theories that people's character is malleable versus fixed, respectively. These findings extend prior research by empirically supporting the notion that the nature of perceivers’ implicit theories about people's character is related to why they perceive a group to be a single entity. The findings, future directions and implications of improved understanding of the assignment of collective blame following CWB are discussed.
AB - Two experimental studies, based on a model using a novel integration of theories, provide evidence that collective blame, the assignment of blame to members of a group besides the member(s) who directly caused a misdeed, in the aftermath of counterproductive work behavior (CWB) is higher when a group of coworkers is perceived as a single entity. Further, the studies consistently show that this relationship is mediated by inferences about both indirect causality and common blameworthy traits among group members. These findings extend prior research, which has not considered mediation in this relationship by dual inferences. Additionally, perceivers’ implicit theories about people's character were found to moderate the inferences they favor, with inferences about indirect causality versus common traits favored by perceivers with implicit theories that people's character is malleable versus fixed, respectively. These findings extend prior research by empirically supporting the notion that the nature of perceivers’ implicit theories about people's character is related to why they perceive a group to be a single entity. The findings, future directions and implications of improved understanding of the assignment of collective blame following CWB are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074926060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074926060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/beer.12251
DO - 10.1111/beer.12251
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074926060
SN - 0962-8770
VL - 29
SP - 212
EP - 226
JO - Business Ethics
JF - Business Ethics
IS - 1
ER -